|
Seminar Topics - Electrical - Electronics - Mechanical - Civil - Chemical - Computer - Automobile |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
SEMINAR TOPICSNEW ENGINEERING SEMINAR TOPICS WITH ABSTRACTS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
INFRANET
The World Wide Web is a prime facilitator of free speech; many people rely
on it to voice their views and to gain access to information those
traditional publishing venues may be loath to publish. However, over the
past few years, many countries, political regimes, and corporations have
attempted to monitor and often restrict access to portions of the Web by
clients who use networks they control. Many of these attempts have been
successful, and the use of the Web as a free-flowing medium for
information exchange is being severely compromised. Several countries
filter Internet content at their borders, fearful of alternate political
views or external influences. For example, China forbids access to many
news sites that have been critical of the country’s domestic policies.
Saudi Arabia is currently soliciting content filter vendors to help block
access to sites that the government deems inappropriate for political or
religious reasons [10]. Germany censors all Nazi-related material.
Australia’s laws ban pornography. In addition, Internet censorship
repeatedly threatens to cross political boundaries. For example, the U.S.
Supreme Court recently rejected France’s request to censor Nazi-related
material on Yahoo’s site [12]. Censorship and surveillance also extend
into free enterprise, with several companies in the U.S. reportedly
blocking access to sites that are not related to conducting business. In
addition to blocking sites, many companies routinely monitor their
employees’. This paper focuses on the challenging technical problems of
circumventing Web censorship and largely ignores the many related
political, legal, and policy issues. In particular, we investigate how to
leverage Web communication with accessible server’s in order to
surreptitiously retrieve censored content, while simultaneously
maintaining plausible deniability against receiving that content. To this
end, we develop a covert communication tunnel that securely hides the
exchange of censored content in normal, innocuous Web transactions. Our
system, called Infranet, consists of requesters and responders
communicating over this covert tunnel. A requester, running on a user’s
computer, first uses the tunnel to request censored content. Upon
receiving the request, the responder, a standard public Web server running
Infranet software retrieves the sought content from the Web and returns it
to the requester via the tunnel.1The covert tunnel protocol between an
Infranet requester and responder must be difficult to detect and block.
More specifically, a censor should not be able to detect that a Web server
is an Infranet responder or that a client is an In-franet requester.
Nothing in their HTTP transactions sought to arouse suspicion. The
Infranet tunnel protocol uses novel techniques for covert upstream
communication. It modulates covert messages on standard HTTP requests for
uncensored content using a confidentially negotiated function which maps
URLs to message fragments that compose requests for censored protocol
leverages existing data hiding techniques, such as steganography. While
steganography provides little defense against certain attacks, we are
confident that the ideas we present can be used in conjunction with other
data hiding techniques. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
| FIND YOUR JOB IN INDIA |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Email to Advertise in this Site About Me
Seminar Topics - Electrical - Electronics - Mechanical - Civil - Chemical - Computer - Automobile
Copyright © 2007. All rights reserved